The Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto has
an interesting theory about the difference
between rich and poor countries.
It’s not that poorer countries lack assets.
It’s that they lack capital.
Hernando de Soto |
An asset is something you possess. Even very
poor countries, de Soto argues, have a wealth of assets. What they don’t have
are the mechanisms to turn their assets into capital – to unlock the potential of those assets
to generate greater wealth.
For example, a house is an asset. It provides
protection from elements, a place to sleep at night, prepare meals, store your
belongings and raise a family. If your house is near other houses, it provides
you with a place in the community.
But if that house is a corrugated metal shack
in an illegal squatter settlement on the edges of mega city, it will never be
anything more than a roof to keep the rain out. That asset is inert.
On the other hand, if you have legal title to
that house, it can do many things in addition to providing shelter. It can be used as collateral to borrow money in order to finance an education, start a
business, or boost the economy. It is an identifiable address that gives its owner access to a wide range of public services, It generates taxes that support
everything from reliable utilities to police protection – all the things that
make communities safe and liveable. That asset becomes a generator of greater
wealth and opportunity.
Poor countries may be rich in assets, but
they lack the financial mechanisms and legal system to turn those assets into
wealth-generating capital.
At least that’s de Soto’s theory. And I’m not
an economist, so I can’t judge how true it is.
However, de Soto’s ideas made me think of an intriguing
parallel in the area, not of economic capital, but of “social capital.” Social capital
refers to the connections between people that make human communities possible.
Churches are rich in social capital. They
have a wealth of interpersonal connections. And they are rich in assets – far
richer than they may realize. But often, churches don’t know how to capitalize
on those assets to generate growth and fruitfulness. Their assets aren’t being
used to their fullest potential.
Take, for example, that basic church asset --
friendliness. I don’t know of a
church whose members don’t think of themselves as friendly. And that is a vital
asset. After all, who wants to go to an unfriendly church?
Friendliness can be a precious commodity in
today’s culture of loneliness. And it’s often our smaller churches who have
this asset in the greatest abundance.
But many churches don’t know how to get the
most out of their innate capacity for friendliness. They lack the means of
sharing that asset with people outside their own circle, of leveraging that asset to generate a
greater wealth of meaningful relationships. With visitors or with people outside
the church, they don’t know how to move from a polite greeting, to an open
conversation, to significant relationships – to move, in other words, from
“friendliness” to “friendship.”
This problem begins with the question of purpose. We have been conditioned over
generations to think that the end game is how to attract people into the church
– and that the only really valid measure of success is how many show up on
Sunday morning. Many a youth ministry or outreach project has been labelled a
failure because it doesn’t increase worship attendance.
Congregational assets may be producing in
ways that we don’t count because we aren’t looking for them. We don’t see the
many ways in which people experience hope, healing and the presence of God through
contact with Christians because those people don’t follow the expected path to
church involvement.
A critical task for churches these days is to
take stock of their assets – not just buildings and trust funds, but the
capacity of their people to represent Jesus to those to who do not yet know him.
But a second and equally critical task is to
come up with simple, practical, effective ways of sharing those assets with
others so that Christ’s ministry is extended.
No comments:
Post a Comment