Sam the Record Man, Toronto |
For a kid who
loved music, Sam’s was like dying and going to heaven. Room upon endless room filled
with every record you could imagine – and many you could not imagine even
existed until you found them in the bins at Sam’s. I’d go with my Christmas
money, or my savings from part time jobs and browse for hours, until I’d
settled on the two or three precious LPs I could afford to buy.
Once I left a
brand new record in the back window of the car where it melted into a warped,
gooey mess. I was so devastated by my loss that I dissolved into tears.
I remember
the feeling of sadness and loss when Sam’s flagship store closed in 2007.
Precious memories. The end of an era.
Of course,
the demise of Sam’s didn’t mean I could no longer get music. In fact, quite the
opposite. Retail record stores failed not because people lost interest in
music, but because there were far easier and cheaper ways to access it.
Now, I pay
$10 a month for a streaming service that gives me access to more music than I
will ever be able to listen to, on my cell phone, at the click of a button.
will ever be able to listen to, on my cell phone, at the click of a button.
Sam’s was a
delivery vehicle. It was a means to an end. When better means came along, there
was no need for Sam’s.
Sam the
Record Man was part of the same vanishing world as the church I grew up in –
Lincoln Avenue United in Cambridge. That church played an even bigger role in
my life than Sam’s, and when it closed in 2002, the feeling of loss was the
similar, but more powerful.
But both
Sam’s and that church closed for the same reason. People were no longer coming.
And I hear
the same question asked over and over again in our churches today: “Why? Why aren’t
people coming? Why aren’t they interested in anymore?”
I’m convinced
that’s the wrong question. Or, at least, it’s not the first question. Just like
the closing of Sam the Record Man didn’t
mean people had lost interest in music, so the closing of our churches doesn’t necessarily
mean people have lost interest in what churches claim to offer – spiritual
nourishment, guidance, friendship, prayer, community, God. People, we’re told, are
as spiritually hungry as they have ever been. It’s just that we keep offering
it in a format that no longer works. Oh, it still works for some of us, which
is why we still have churches. But fewer and fewer people are willing to travel
to a fixed location at one fixed time in the week to satisfy their search for
God.
Most of our
churches follow a script that hasn’t really changed much since the 1950s: a
Sunday morning worship service, plus midweek groups and activities, all in the
church building. That’s the equivalent of telling people that, if they want
music, they have to drive to a record store to get it. It’s preserving the form
and neglecting the content.
Now, I want
to be careful. I don’t want to suggest that the church should become like
Amazon – one click shopping in the privacy of your home. And I don’t want to
suggest that something precious hasn’t been lost in the age of instant connection
and information. Downloading an album from Apple Music is not the same experience
as a trip to Sam’s.
The point is
that there are changes happening that are way bigger than we are, and there is
no way for us to turn them back.
The music industry to turn the clock back. They tried to resist the shift from hard recordings on CDs to music downloaded from the
internet. They even managed to close down the original file-sharing website,
Napster, after a costly court battle. But they couldn’t resist the tide of
change. Ironically, by resisting rather than seeking ways to work with new formats
and technologies, they hurt their own cause.
If churches
want to connect with people in new ways, they need to learn about the ways in
which people, especially young people, connect. And they need to think long and
hard about the new tools, the new “delivery systems” that might bring the Good
News to people in fresh ways.
Great piece of writing and thinking..... we have evolved into wanting different ways of delivery of the message - the message is still necessary and wanted! thanks
ReplyDeleteThanks Paul for pushing the body to see the hard lessons not learned in other institutions. The other issue is that Sam's although part of the industry didn't take the individual and daring step to do something different itself. Every single congregation has to take responsibility to ask "who isn't here on Sunday morning and why?" Then, "what can we do differently to share the Good News with them where ever and however it can be as seeds to their hearts?" The ultimate question is to you and me not the faceless church. What am I willing to do differently for Christ's sake?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Gary. I agree that we're in a time when personal commitment and relationship building are the key to everything. They're skills that we need to reacquire. Good idea for a future blog post!
ReplyDelete